Top Left Corner
Top Right Corner
National Union of Journalists Home Page
Glasgow Branch
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜
˜ Site Info
Inside Corner
 
left round end
Election Special right round end 
       
 
 

Election: a voyeur observes

As the election for Deputy General Secretary hots up, Bernard Thompson offers a personal commentary on some early exchanges

Gadzooks! Democracy is a strange poison.

What else but the drug of candidacy takes reasonable, mild-mannered men (troublingly few women) and turns them into vocal master debaters?

As for me, a devotee of Marxist ideology (Grouchian school), I have nothing to do with elections, if I can help it, taking the view that I wouldn't want the job of representing anyone idiotic enough to vote for me.

I have the guts of a scallop and a spine modelled on a slinky spring so I restrict myself to sniping from the sidelines while braver souls reach for the cudgels.

There is, though, a darker side to my nature - a shit-stirring tendency that sets sister against brother; colleague against comrade; candidate against voter. You wouldn't wanna know me, bub!

But never, (at least since I told Knee-nuts O'Hara what Crucifier Campbell did in his fish tank) have I instigated such ill-feeling - with such little effort!

I shall begin my explanation in time-honoured style by blaming someone else - Brother Youett. It was he, also known as Chris, who asked me if I could possibly arrange a hustings - with sandwiches - in Glasgow.

I did not miss my opportunity. I set to work emailing the other candidates and copying in various members in Scotland who might take an interest. I now concede that this was a deliberately provocative move and happily, within hours, a storm was brewing.

John Fray accepted the challenge; Fraser Addecott politely declined, citing a desire to save the union money and Greg Lloyd Smith of the "action, initiative and fortitude" dismissed the notion as a "waste of time" and an exercise in "hand-holding".

Step up, Glasgow branch chair, Rory MacLeod, with his open response, urging that Greg think again and not think of the union as a "corporate company".

Absurd! "Everything should be operated as though it were a corporation; but especially Unions," said Greg.

"How can we understand the community our members serve if we try to hold ourselves out as something special or different? The Union IS a business, endeavouring to service its members and provide quality labour to the community….

"Anyone who says different doesn't understand the objective or is working towards a personal agenda."

And who could argue with someone who has received "1 question (quite intelligent), 2 general comments and several hundred emails of support; oh yeah and a silly comment from one of Mr Fray's supports"?

Speechless, Rory replied: "If [the union was to be run as a corporation] we would surely be derecognising our staff and laying many of them off with paltry remuneration and keeping a low-wage structure for the few that remain.

"The allusion of the union being like a business is not a good one. It misses the point of the reason why they exist, were set up, and are still necessary."

With a "Whoosh!" and a "Gosh!" Greg declared himself - and his assistant - unable to understand MacLeod's comments.

But he revealed that down his street in Mykonos (somewhat south-east of the Gorbals) he has much success in local politics having never attended a meeting in almost 20 years.

Declaring that all the others copied into the email were voyeurs and hangers-on, Greg quickly bid adieu.

Inexplicably, Rory surprised Lloyd Smith by advising that he had lost the MacLeod vote. But, perhaps concealing his hurt, Greg retorted that it mattered not a jot: "It is not your vote that matters (at all) but the nearly 24,000 members who didn't bother to vote in the last election."

It was with apparent bemusement and no little exasperation that MacLeod greeted this expression of contempt, urging that Lloyd Smith "Get serious about the election … or have the dignity and respect for those that want to do something and withdraw...."

"Shame on you," said Greg - by this time the voyeuristic hangers-on were beside themselves.

Soon, a new name appeared amid their number for Greg had copied in one Jacob Ecclestone, before drawing the thrill-seeking gallery's attention to the following link:

http://213.55.2.162/ecclestone/nuj.phtml

After some more to-ing and fro-ing, Greg availed us of some home-spun wisdom from his father (who I didn't know was even in the Waltons): "My ole Dad used to say when you point the finger at someone, be careful b'cause there's three more fingers pointing back at you!"

He then said something about MacLeod serving his "masters" and I almost fancied that I heard a wicked laugh but I couldn't be sure as I was playing my banjo and indulging in voyeurism at the same time.

Well, hostilities soon ceased but not before I (I'm such a rogue) had asked Greg if he had ever attended an NUJ meeting - which he hasn't - and he suggested I go to the NUJ website forum - which I did (and I suggest that you do too, dear members).

There, Greg had other antagonists, all of whom he thought to be "disgruntled Scotsmen". One of those suggested that members search for Greg Lloyd Smith on the internet - which I did.

But that, my friends, is another story.

Read the full exchange
Incomprehension of the (Greek) lambs

Visit the NUJ forum (requires login)

06/06/03

An open letter to Greg Lloyd Smith

Glasgow branch chair, Rory MacLeod, has responded to Greg Lloyd Smith's comments on holding a hustings:

Greg,

I see that as a shame. As someone else who has, for most of the last 20 years, worked in the commercial world and adopted a lack-time-wasting strategy like yourself I think it would still be seen as folly not to take the chance to show the potential electorate how you would deliver "action, initiative, and fortitude" to the NUJ membership.

When I started my build up to becoming president of our union I was given some sound advice - don't treat it like a corporate company, the members don't see it that way.

While you may be able to bring many qualities to the post if you were successful in your election, the membership - as any inquiring journalist should do - may wish to test the theory with questions of their own. After all, you are asking them to trust you with their membership, dues and union.

It is entirely up to you, but I think it would do a disservice to the membership if there were to be hustings and you denied them the opportunity to use them to test your views against their own judgement.

The hustings are not for the service of those standing for election; they are designed to allow the membership to see the whites of the eyes of the candidates and to put their theories of how they would act in the name of members to the test.

Rory MacLeod
Chair, Glasgow Branch
Former President NUJ

(Reproduced with permission)

Election Special
04/06/03

Battle of Hustings? You must be joking!

Your faithful Ed was feeling somewhat chastened today after being on the receiving end of a good old-fashioned snook-cocking (no physical contact involved).

When one of the candidates for Deputy General Secretary asked him to organise a Scottish hustings Ed was feeling rather satisfied that his reputation for selflessness and efficiency had seeped south of the border.

The natural thing to do seemed to be to sound out the other candidates (one-man hustings can be a bit uneven, after all). One contender quickly welcomed the challenge leaving Ed feeling all fraternally validated.

But imagine the quiver in his lip when he received the following response from Greg Lloyd Smith:

"Unlike many I do not see the value in making political campaign speeches.

"I operate within the commercial world with a minimum of Meetings as I view them as a waste of time for the most part. I stand for action, initiative and fortitude.

"Identifying problems, seeing a way through to resolution and acting on that plan is what I do every day, seven days a week. Hand-holding and campaign promises should be left for others.

"I am always available for a Meeting worthy of the time required, by [sic] in this case, I see little reason for it."

Consider the snook cocked Mr Blair, err Smith.

Election Special
04/06/03
© 2001-03 NUJ & Contributors
 
email